The other day I was reminded of this again when I was talking acetone to another colleague. I sugge

We are right here to create memory in plastic. It may sound strange but many besides ourselves have shown that it works. But what about other subjects? How's the water, for example? Have water memory?
The other week I tried in my own blog account for some of the perverse math behind homeopathic medicine. acetone The underlying principle is that the effect is greater the more the active substance is diluted. This is not possible with less than redefining alternative vantolkar basic scientific acetone theses. Homeopathy proponents argue that it is not the active substance itself, but rather the water storage of the substance that lies behind the effect. But there really is such a memory? No, it has never been demonstrated in a convincing manner. I do not think for a moment about it, to put it bluntly.
But let us still complicate the issue for a little while. It had in fact been answered differently 40 years ago. For a short period there was the hypothesis of poly water - ie water with memory - in scientific papers, even in reputable journals. All 400 papers have been published on this theme. For those who want a closer look at the most important works so there is an excellent summary here. For those who are content with a short summary, see below.
The hypothesis originated in a study from 1962 by the then quite Unknown chemist Fedyakin. When the water came in contact with the newly formed glass surface in a thin capillary water so exhibited altered properties. It was alleged boil first at 500 C and could not possibly be frozen. The properties of poly water, as it was called, acetone was permanent and in some ways it was therefore correct to say that polyvattnet had a memory of the surface, where it formed. Several studies were then made of the relative Fedyakin more renowned colleague Deryagin, who also got to prefer its findings to the Faraday acetone Society in Nottingham in 1966.
Arts and Sciences of West responded initially skeptical, but attitudes changed when the American acetone Lippincott published work in Science, where polyvatten allegedly be detected. Criticism was still against the idea but for a couple of years later can still polyvattenhypotesen said to have been established. Concern over what polyvattnet could bring in terms of misery was also expressed. See this clipping from a Times interview in 1969:
Physicist Frank Donahoe of Pennsylvania's Wilkes College, for one, thinks polywater That could pose a threat to all life. Once it is let loose, the stuff might propagate itself, feeding on natural water. The proliferation of Such a dense, inert liquid, WARN Donahoe, could stop all life processes, turning the earth into a "reasonable facsimile of Venus." Lippincott considers That slight danger. But he concedes That until scientists know more about polywater, They Should handle it with care.
Well, the worry was unfounded as it turned out. The questioning research reports became more and in 1973 the curtain down for this research field. Deryagin, which has long defended the hypothesis, then published with a colleague, a work in which the deviant behavior was explained by impurities in the system. So much for that. Since 1974, we find no polyvattenarbeten in the scientific literature. Sociologists, economists and bibliometriker has researched the phenomenon: what happens to the careers of the scientists who advocated this stuff blind shots? Some direct benefits is of course difficult to pinpoint, but especially bad, only if one has not been established previously. The already recognized scholar can afford to go wrong sometime, within reason, anyway.
My own connection to this story is far-fetched. In the late 1990s, I worked together with a creative Ukrainian colleague and one day we came to discuss that hypothesis polyvatten. Analogous to how our plastic systems work so he thought it certainly should be possible to create memory in the water. acetone If the water is frozen in the presence of any subject of interest, and then the ice is kept in cold storage as a cast should be left behind if they managed to peel off topic from the ice. The memory would go to prove by chromatographic binding studies. I agreed with him. Some questions came up of course: 1) How to get an efficient solvent acetone flow through the ice? (Namely, the need for analysis) 2) Who wants to stand in the freezing room and work for a few weeks? According to what I later understood as has his colleague made attempts on a smaller scale, with very limited acetone success, acetone and without publishing the results. A third issue that inevitably meets scientists trying to publish and wishing acetone resources are namely: Why did you do this? And he wants to make an impression on an editor or funding body so it is easier if you can get a better answer than:-Because we thought it should be possible to do.
The other day I was reminded of this again when I was talking acetone to another colleague. I suggested that a more